Evaluating Professional Development (1-off Series) [Thomas R. Guskey] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This is a practical guide to. Evaluating Professional. Development. By. Thomas R. Guskey. University of Kentucky. (Article reprinted with permission from Dr. Guskey). Evaluating Professional Development has 27 ratings and 3 reviews. June said: A very user friendly book to guide evaluation efforts at the state and local.
|Published (Last):||17 March 2018|
|PDF File Size:||1.47 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.99 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This past year, I’ve met with leaders in the U. Some lists were based on the concurrence opinions among researchers, others used teacher self-reports, and only a few looked at impact on student learning. If they don’t see such evidence, they quite naturally revert back to the tried and true things they’ve done in the past. These Standards represent an attempt to give people in the field some guidelines for their work and some criteria by which to judge the effectiveness of their efforts.
Evaluating Professional Development
It provided additional insight to my ongoing studies in the field of education. Third, many educators are now finding how useful it can be to reverse these five levels in professional development planning. As a participant in PD, I have often only thought about my learning and skill and how it connected to my students. The power of thinking in terms of the five evaluation levels is engaging teachers in the planning of professional development activities.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Andria rated it really liked it Dec 03, They need to gain specific knowledge and skills before we look to the organization for critical aspects of support or change.
Evaluating Professional Development, according to Guskey ()
Things broke down at the organization level. Historically, professional development leaders haven’t done a very good job of providing any such evidence.
Kim Wright rated it really liked profesaional Jan 06, Practice and Theory Philip Adey Limited evqluating – Marc marked it as to-read Jul 02, My conclusion was that we may not have a true consensus on what makes professional development effective, and that moving toward one may be more complicated than most people think.
It requires a level of experimental rigor that is hard and often impossible to attain in practical school settings.
They must ensure that research comes from reliable sources, specifically peer-reviewed journals. But most policymakers, legislators, and school leaders are not asking for ironclad proof.
To ask other readers questions about Evaluating Professional Developmentplease sign up. Why are levels four and five of your evaluation model—in which professional development is linked to student outcomes—so difficult to accomplish? Hightower Limited preview – What do you hope people take away from your model?
This isn’t because they are afraid of change. The book asks and answers significant questions and provides specific recommendations for future action. I conducted a study in which developmsnt of educators were asked to rank order 15 different indicators of student learning in terms of which they believed provided the most valid evidence.
Things can break down at any point along the way, and once they break down, the improvement process comes to a screeching halt. This is a practical guide to evaluating professional development programs at five increasing levels of sophistication: Karen Soanes added it Apr 10, Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Vicky rated it really liked it Oct 15, Danibab added it Feb 08, Contains approximately references. Nicholas Little rated it really liked it Sep 15, If I know what I want to evapuating and what evidence best reflects those goals, it’s easier for developnent to decide how and when I’m going to gather that evidence and what I will debelopment with it once I have it. Susan Carmody added it Oct 08, A graduate of the University of Chicago, he began his career in education as a middle school teacher, served as an administrator in Chicago Public Schools, and was the first Director of the Evaluatign for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning, a national educational research center.
Again, develolment backward makes this clearer. Organization Support and Change”; 7 “Level 4: Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Return to Book Page. For example, they describe professional importance of extended time for professional development and the need to ensure that activities are ongoing and job-embedded. Books by Thomas R. Georgie rated it really liked it Jan 19, Because of their general nature, however, these Standards leave a lot of room for interpretation.
Participants’ Learning”; 6 “Level 3: I believe that certain aspects of the No Child Left Evaulating Act are motivated by frustration on the part of the federal government in allocating funds to education and not seeing much come from it.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. See 1 question about Evaluating Professional Development…. Planning more carefully and more devslopment not only makes evaluation easier, it also leads to much more effective professional development.
Evaluating Professional Development by Thomas R. Portraits of an Educator Ed. Want to Read saving…. What is your five-level model for evaluating professional development, and how did it come to be? My library Help Advanced Book Search.